Saturday, June 27, 2009

Groundbreaking Priority

Like one of my other linked blogs "They Grow Up Slow," this is a type of priority. Its entirety is a 55,000 word dissertation. Here's the query I am considering using, as of this date--

The study of reality for Earth reads, in chronologic history--
1. nonmoving and flat
2. nonmoving and round
3. moving (rotating) and round
4. moving more (around the sun) and round
5. moving more (continental drift)
This is where we are now. I know how to show the next step, that the ground flows instead of us walking. This would be controversial and major.
The evidence presented in Motion Health: The Ground Can Flow--
1. Motion was written of differently thousands of years ago. Verbs have evolved, but were once used for the ground and plants. Maneating plant stories develop from this.
2. Since we do not know other animals' languages, we cannot ascribe our physics and motion to them. Because of the efficiency they use in motion, it is like they have what we call a "runner's high"-- when the ground seems to move.
3. We have various disorders related to moving ground: motion sickness, vertigo, others, that are traceable back to other animals, and seem to have developed, but that other species might know as normal sensing.
4. Our belief in astrology, never fully explained, is a partial realizing that we are tied to above, not to the ground.
5. The accolades in science such as "groundbreaking," "earth-shaking," and others in this family, are actually indications of a bias to non-moving ground, and an indirect invitation to question this belief and then explain it.
6. There are many indications in earth science of a much more active ground, behaving like a fluid.
7. Implications for destiny are involved.The manuscript is 55,000 words in its present form.
There are other offered proofs. Thank you. Could I provide you a synopsis next?